.

Government of, by, and for…?

Do you want Wal-Mart picking our President? How about Exxon Mobil choosing your next member of Congress?

Do you want Wal-Mart picking our President? How about Exxon Mobil choosing your next member of Congress?

As we kick-off the 2012 election season, we are at a time of deep lack of faith in our democracy. One big reason: Corporations are gaining more and more power at election time.

They have long been able to hire armies of lobbyists to roam the corridors of power. But thanks to the Supreme Court’s decision last year in Citizens United v. FEC that “corporations are people,” unrestricted waves of corporate cash can now flood TV and radio with so-called “independent expenditures” pushing the candidates that those corporations prefer.

In New York City, We are Fighting Back…for a Democracy of, by, and for the People (Not the Corporations)

Supporting a Constitutional amendment to repeal “corporate personhood”
Wednesday, the City Council passed a resolution that I sponsored (along with colleagues in the Progressive Caucus) calling for a constitutional amendment to overturn that wrongheaded ruling by the Supreme Court in Citizens United and make clear that corporations aren’t people, and don’t have “free speech” rights to buy and sell our elections.

While only symbolic, it’s an important step. The Los Angeles City Council passed a similar resolution last month and other cities have taken stands. The movement is building to take back our elections.

Protecting our Local Campaign Finance Laws

New York City already has one of the country’s strongest campaign finance laws, including reasonable contribution limits and public matching funds (so that working people have a real chance of winning office). 

Our local laws bar corporate contributions, and—especially important—place strict limits on contributions from lobbyists or individuals who do business with the City.

Our laws have been strengthened over the years, but not without resistance from moneyed interests.

Some good news: Just before the holidays, the United States Court of Appeals upheld the City’s campaign finance law, ruling against members of the Conservative Party who challenged it, hoping to restore the power of lobbyists and those holding or seeking City contracts to influence elections. Thanks to the court ruling, New York City’s local elections will remain some of the fairest in the country.

Back when the suit was brought in 2009 (when I was a candidate for office) I was proud to submit an amicus curiae brief in the case, along with Mark Winston Griffith, supporting the City’s Campaign Finance Law. Thanks to Jenner & Block for preparing the amicus. The Second Circuit’s decision is here.

Expanding Democratic Participation

Many of you have also been part of renewing local democracy in New York. Over the past few months, I’ve been working with constituents on participatory budgeting, which is allowing residents of this district to decide how money will be spent in their neighborhoods.

Last fall, we held big community meetings to gather ideas and many residents volunteered to help with the research and decide what projects to put before voters.

In March, you will be able vote on which projects get funding. Check out BradLander.com/PB for updates on some of the projects being considered.

If we want a government that is truly of, by, and for the people—all of us—then we need to keep corporations and their lobbyists from dominating our elections. Our democracy depends on it.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Parksloper January 11, 2012 at 02:11 AM
Progressives just love Freedom of Speech. Not. "Unions are gaining more and more power at election time." Fixed it for you. Did you include Unions in this lawsuit? And by the way "The FEC requires that super PACs report expenditures “expressly advocating the election or defeat of clearly identified federal candidates” within 24 hours (or 48 hours, if the election in question is more than 20 days away)." so people know what is going on with their candidates.
Shopkeeper50 January 13, 2012 at 09:32 PM
Idealogues should not hold office or be able introduce legislation. They are willing to resort to omissions and dishonesty to push agendas. In this coming election season lets elect people whose integrity is intact.
OldParkSloper January 15, 2012 at 04:09 PM
I believe that fears about huge corporate campaign contributions are unwarranted. If corporations are people, as the Republican’s leading candidate for President claims, then a campaign contribution from a corporation could be no greater than the contribution a individual is allowed to make. Of course, if life begins at conception, as many in that party assert, there is the possibility that the Republicans might attempt to have a 35 year-old corporation created and currently headquartered in the United States, become its Presidential candidate.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »