The Transformation of Fourth Avenue: A Community Driven Process
In a town hall meeting, the community suggested how they would like to see Fourth Avenue transformed into “Brooklyn Boulevard.”
The transformation of Fourth Avenue into the grand, landscaped “Brooklyn Boulevard” from “Atlantic Avenue to the Atlantic Ocean,” as Borough President Marty Markowitz has said, is in your hands.
Markowitz’s Fourth Avenue Task Force, chaired by his Senior Advisor, Carlo Scissura, held its second town hall meeting on Thursday night at St. Michael’s Church, on 43rd Street just off Fourth Avenue, to hear community suggestions on specific changes they would like to see made on the notorious 6.2-mile speedway, known as a racetrack for drivers to quickly get from one neighborhood to another.
The agenda of the task force is to transform the six lane street, which is ranked the third most dangerous road in Brooklyn, from a barren strip speckled with parking garages, auto mechanics and bleak walls to an avenue Brooklyn can be proud.
The strip is slated to have a Special Fourth Avenue Enhanced Commercial District with bustling businesses, manicured, tree-lined mediums and other major changes depending on the community’s wants and needs.
“The task force was created to oversee and facilitate a community driven transformation of Fourth Avenue,” Scissura said during the meeting to a room of about 75 community members from Park Slope, Sunset Park and Bay Ridge. “The actual changes will not be what I want, not what Marty wants, not what the elected officials want, but what the community wants—our job is just to make it happen.”
Created by Markowitz in August 2011, the task force had its first town hall meeting in November 2011, and has successfully changed the avenue’s zoning in order to add more retail space to the speedway from Pacific Street to 24th Street.
After a PowerPoint presentation of the changes already slated for the avenue, including the $2 million refurbishing of the Fourth Avenue-Ninth Street subway station, which will be completed within the year, the meeting opened into a public forum where community members shared their suggestions.
Joaquin Brito, a Sunset Park resident, said he thinks the avenue’s width needs to be compressed through neckdowns, that way pedestrians have a shorter distance to cross.
“The street’s mediums are the thinnest parts of the avenue. I am afraid of driving past people standing on the medium, the wind from a passing car may knock them over. The mediums need to be wider,” Brito said, who is a 20-year-old UPROSE volunteer, a Sunset Park-based nonprofit.
As he pointed to a picture of a Sunset Park intersection, he said fear rules the lives of Fourth Avenue’s pedestrians.
“As a young kid crossing Fourth Avenue I was scared. I was scared as hell everyday,” he said. “Even now, I am petrified to cross the street.”
A Park Slope resident, Josefina Sanfeliú, echoed that fear.
“I am in absolute terror while I cross Fourth Avenue,” said Sanfeliú of Ninth Street’s intersection. “There are multiple ways to get hit by a car, pedestrians should not have to run.”
Although the Department of Transportation installed countdown clocks along the avenue from Pacific Street to 65th Street this past summer, Joanne Zhao, a Sunset Park resident, said there is still not enough time for pedestrians to safely cross.
“I have counted how long the light stays red before the countdown clocks start, it is about 15 to 20 seconds,” Zhao said. “A lot of kids and senior citizens live along the avenue, including my grandma, and I know they have trouble crossing before the light turns green.”
In September 2009, Markowitz partnered with NYU Wagner Graduate School to formulate a detailed, 84-page vision plan for the corridor. It was not a report of how the avenue will look like, but rather what the “traffic chute” could look like.
But a Park Slope resident, Ellen Freudenheim, the editor of Brooklyn About.com, sais she was not impressed with the report.
“I read that report and it is chalk full of typos. The ideas were pedestrian and unimaginative…it was a student piece of work,” Freudenheim said, who suggested the vision plan be given to professional Brooklyn-based architects and city planners. “We are talking about a major once-in-a-life-time piece of development that is going to affect a major artery. Why get third best?”
Freudenheim also said that increased public transportation was missing from the plan.
“If we are creating a corridor that pulls people into Brooklyn from Staten Island to the Barclays Center, we need a bus to go up and down Fourth Avenue to alleviate traffic and bring residents and visitors to restaurants,” she suggested.
Elizabeth Yeampierre, the executive director of UPROSE, said that a successful transformation needs to keep the communities in mind the many different social, cultural and economic demographics the avenue transverses.
“I am not interested in helping tourists visit Brooklyn. This transformation needs to support the mom-and-pop shops that are the economic backbone of our neighborhoods,” Yeampierre said.
Near the end of the meeting Scissura said that an “action plan,” which will spell out the next few projects, will be released this summer. He also said that another round of town hall meetings with Community Boards 2, 6, 7 and 10 will meet from September to December 2012.
While opening the meeting, Scissura defined what the new Fourth Avenue will become.
“Brooklyn Boulevard will be a livable street that stretches more than six miles and engages residents and visitors and has visible, social and economic opportunities,” Scissura said. “The goal is to create a signature street in Brooklyn that has a defined sense of place, embodies cultural and local identities and accommodates multiple forms of transportation.”
Do you have any suggestions for Brooklyn Boulevard? Tell us in the comments!
Stella
9:06 pm on Friday, January 20, 2012
Gotta fix the speeding drivers on 4th Avenue. Make the street narrow, make it easier for pedestrians to cross, put in a bike lane, and get the damn NYPD off their butts to do something about the drivers!
Michael Brown
11:19 pm on Friday, January 20, 2012
Not sure a bike lane is really needed, but eliminating one lane of traffic is necessary.
Park Slope rider
9:34 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
Speaking of typos, it's MEDIAN.
And a bike lane will make everyone safer.
Jacob
9:47 am on Monday, January 23, 2012
Eliminating a lane of traffic would greatly reduce speeding. With the extra space, you could easily install a protected bike lane, like the ones they have in Manhattan. This would dramatically reduce pedestrian crossing distances, add greenery, and create a viable bike route for children, parents, and seniors, not just the brave.
tom murphy
4:55 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012
Of course, eliminating a travel lane would slow the traffic on 4th Avenue; but, it would also reduce the capacity on an already congested local truck route. Time and productivity would be further lost.
Current levels of traffic are not going away. This is not Manhattan-bound traffic; it's Brooklyn traffic. Projections into the future show the continued need for this artery with current capacity.
The Vision report rejects bike lanes there due to the continuing high volume of vehicles and encourages looking at 5th or 3rd Avenues as an alternate. Someday we will have the Greenway along the waterfront as a safe north/south route for biking.
Erika
5:50 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012
The vision report was written years ago by NYU students. It's not a hard and fast recommendation by any means. That it rejects bike lanes is irrelevant. Current levels of traffic will in fact go away as gas prices go up.
You can reduce capacity for private vehicles on 4th while still providing ample room for trucks. 3rd is also a truck route and has a bike lane.
The point now is that any and all options are on the table. Don't be a reflexive bike hater!
Jonathan Angelilli
6:10 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012
Huge opportunity to create a thriving boulevard that supports a sustainable economy & high quality of life for the "spine of Brooklyn". Elevated cross walks, protected bike lanes, express bus lane, speed bumps, tons of trees & greenery, benches, Smart Parking, area's for farmer's markets, etc. The future is now, let the naysayers naysay all they want. And let the reckless drivers that cause billions of dollars of damage each year (not to mention killing over 300 people/year) pay for all the improvements.
Parksloper
7:49 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012
"And let the reckless drivers that cause billions of dollars of damage each year"
Source for that idiotic comment?
Erika
10:36 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012
"The nation's largest cities, such as New York and Los Angeles, face billions of dollars in costs each year from car accidents. In the New York metropolitan area, crashes cost the region $18 billion a year, or about $962 per person; they cost Los Angeles more than $10 billion a year, or $817 per person."
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Insurance/InsureYourCar/WhatCarCrashesCostYou.aspx
Parksloper, what's your source for calling the comment "idiotic"?
Giacomo
6:18 am on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
"The nation's largest cities, such as New York and Los Angeles, face billions of dollars in costs each year from car accidents." Yes and if we make it impossible for vehicle and commerce transit on the roadways...that won't cost the city/taxpayers a dime will it. "Huge opportunity to create a thriving boulevard that supports a sustainable economy & high quality of life for the "spine of Brooklyn". Elevated cross walks, protected bike lanes, express bus lane, speed bumps, tons of trees & greenery, benches, Smart Parking, area's for farmer's markets, etc. The future is now" I think al you left out was jetpacks, & underwater cities. Or you could just move to freakin' Montclair and save a lot of time.
Michael Brown
2:19 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Right on! It's not like study after study have proven that slower traffic aids commerce and provides a greater tax payer return on infrastructure investments.
Oh, wait...
Giacomo
4:12 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
It's uncanny how we always agree!
Michael Brown
5:12 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
it's true. Here's one example on the fallacy of the economic efficiency of fast-moving traffic, solely from a tax revenue perspective: http://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2012/1/2/the-cost-of-auto-orientation.html
Victor Acevedo
12:03 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
The amount of time that is given to cross the avenue isn't enough time for the elderly and children. I lived in an apartment building facing the avenue for 17 years and the avenue did not change much.