Crafting a Vision for Park Slope
What sacrifices will Slope residents make in order to ensure the neighborhood is a special place to live?
How willing are Slopers to make sacrifices to ensure that Park Slope remains a special place to live?
In recent months the number of vacant storefronts on Seventh Avenue has reached upwards of 15. With rents ranging anywhere from $5,000 to more than $20,000 per month it seems that cell phone stores, real estate offices and national chains are the only businesses that can afford doing business here.
But aren’t the so-called mom-and-pop-shops or independent businesses an important component of what makes Park Slope the urban haven it is?
Think about it. What would Park Slope be if Seventh Avenue was wall-to-wall large drugstores and other national chains?
Sounds pretty boring. We could call it the Seventh Avenue Strip Mall.
And one thing’s for sure: the Seventh Avenue Strip Mall would certainly lack that ineffable essence that makes Park Slope such a livable neighborhood—and a fun place for locals and visitors to shop and stroll.
A few weeks ago, Video Forum, a popular Seventh Avenue video rental shop, announced that it was closing at the end of March citing Netflix streaming video and a significant drop in revenue.
Perhaps it was just matter of time before Video they succumbed to market forces. Still, many in the neighborhood lamented the loss of a friendly place to browse for videos and talk to real people—shopkeepers and other customers—about movies.
It was a real community, not a virtual one.
So what would it take for Park Slope to keep its local video rental store business? Would locals be willing to commit to using a brick and mortar rental shop rather than Netflix? Or at least use their local video store in combination with Netflix?
Let’s see what this sacrifice really looks like.
You’d have to willing to pay more money per rental than Netflix, which offers a monthly fee for as many videos as you want. You’d have to be willing to leave your house for a video rather than get your DVDs via a red envelope in your mailbox. And you’d have to be diligent about returning the DVDs on time so as not to accrue late fees.
Are locals willing to sacrifice savings, selection and convenience for the sake of the community feeling that a destination like Video Forum engenders?
How about independent booksellers like the Community Bookstore? I’m old enough to remember when Park Slope had another indie bookstore, Booklink, before the advent of Barnes and Noble and Amazon.
So that the Community Bookstore doesn’t suffer a similar fate as Video Forum, are enough Slopers willing to commit to shopping there rather than a virtual store or chain?
What does this sacrifice really look like?
It could mean ordering a book they don’t have in stock and waiting a few days for the book to come in.
It could mean paying a bit more money for a book that is handed to you by a real person rather than purchased online.
It could also mean splitting your purchases: one for Amazon, one for Barnes and Noble and one (or two) for the Community Bookstore. Even a small step like that might help an independent bookstore survive.
Indeed, these are sacrifices. It takes planning and patience to pass up a book at a Barnes and Noble and say, “Hey, let me see if they’ve got it at the Community Bookstore.”
Clearly, it’s up to each person to decide what they’re willing to sacrifice and whether it’s worth it to them in the short term so that the neighborhood’s unique character thrives.
Melanie Hope Greenberg, a local children’s book author believes that brick-and-mortar shopping is the way to go. “I never use credit cards online,” she wrote in an E-mail.
Some locals are conflicted. Margaret Seilier, who lives in Park Slope with her husband and two daughters, likes the idea of patronizing mom-and-pops. “But the big chains (like Barnes and Noble) are just so convenient sometimes!” she said.
Robin Smith, who lives in Park Slope with her husband and two children in a fourth floor walk up, finds that services like Fresh Direct and Amazon are way too convenient to give up. “But for clothes/shoes/gifts. I love indie stores. Jack Rabbit is great for sporty stuff. All that said I treasure that we live in a hood with few chain stores and cherish shopping in mom/pop stores.”
Still others won’t pass up the convenience of the online experience: Chantall Brachmann-Scott, who lives in Prospect Heights and teaches Pilates and IntenSati, does all her food shopping locally and never uses a service like Fresh Direct. However, she said, “I have to admit I do shop at Amazon for used books because I don't want to contribute to the waste of making new books. I do love my Netflix, I never set foot in a video store in my life.”
But consumers aren’t the only ones with a civic responsibility. What about the landlords of the storefronts on Seventh Avenue? How willing are they to make a sacrifice to ensure that this neighborhood retains its essence? Sure, landlords are in business just like everyone else. But how many of them would be willing to reduce the rent to make it possible for local businesses to continue doing business there? Don’t they have a stake in this community, too?
Look at Bergen Street between Flatbush and Fifth avenues. Michael and Matthew Pintchik, the brothers who own the hardware store and a lot of property near the store, had the idea to create a unique shopping destination on Bergen Street with shops like Babeland, Bergen Street Comics, Bark and Bump. So they decided to paint all the storefronts the same color and give them an attractive, uniform look. They culled through many rental applications to select the right mix of interesting indie shops.
Now that’s vision.
Is something like this possible on Seventh Avenue? Are there other landlords with vision out there—or is it just easier to accept the higher rents from businesses that can afford it?
Finally, what about the city itself? In the same way that it’s willing to give landmark status to buildings and neighborhoods, that merit such a designation, is the city willing to create small business strips (like Bergen Street) by giving substantial tax breaks to property owners and shopkeepers to help them stay in business?
Clearly, it takes vision, commitment and sacrifice whether you’re a consumer, a local business, a property owner or a city government when it comes to making sacrifices so that urban streets retain their unique charm and livability.
Gia Sharp
1:59 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011
Wow, I didn't realize that the Pintchik brothers were behind the Bergen St explosion. That is great vision. I think this article is a great first step, but in order to make real change on 7th ave, there's going to have to be a real dialogue with the landlords who are charging excessive rents. I try to do my part by patronizing the mom and pop's when I can, but I have to say, the extinction of the video store was just a matter of time.
Mary
4:06 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011
Park Slope residents, like the freeman and craftspeople of yore can have a vision of what they would like their village to be, but the landlords just like the landowners of the middle ages can transfer land without restriction and ultimately have the power to change the way of life for all those living in a feifdom. The Banker, Realtor, and Burger Vassals have taken over 7th avenue!
bklynkit
4:42 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011
It's an absolute shame what has transpired on 7th Avenue.....greed is a funny thing. Many years ago there were many storefronts for rent, people leaving the neighborhood due to know one knowing which way the slope would go, good or bad. Yes there was a time when 7th Avenue could be looked as dangerous, nevermind what they thought of 5th Ave...It actually turned into a beautiful neighborhood, affordable, people could realize their dreams, open up a business and actually make a living and survive. Then it all turned around and here is what we are left with, empty store fronts but for all the wrong reasons.
OldParkSloper
6:24 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011
The builders responsible for many of the unattractive apartment buildings being erected on Fourth Avenue are part of the problem. Failing to provide ground floor storefronts, besides making these buildings look weird, adds to the upward pressure on retail rental rates in Park Slope.
fonda
8:23 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011
louise...thank you so much for this and your other articles concerned with mom and pops surviving on our avenues.
i thought i might share a bit of my experience as a merchant .
when park slope began to be infused with new life after the rush from brooklyn to the suburbs in the 50's, the attraction was a brownstone neighborhood, inexpensive real estate, and a diverse collection of people looking for an alternative to living in manhattan.
along with that reverse migration, came a crop of small shops on seventh avenue, opened by locals who wanted to be creative and capitalize on a personal interest...a small cafe,a cheese shop, a coffee shop, a flower shop., a record shop..a "little things' shop.
those stores helped grow the neighborhood, made it feel lived in, safer,more like a community. when you went in to these shops, there was that familiar face of the owner behind the counter, your neighbor, who knew your name, asked about your family,shared the local news.
i applaud the pintchik boys for their commitment to their strip on bergen street...they learned well from their parents about giving back to the community. they are not typical landlords unfortunately...they are the exception to the norm.
the only answer to keeping the small shops healthy is local support from the community....without it, we will be left with punch press formula chain stores and rotating vacancies.
onemorefoldedsunset
12:38 am on Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Seventh has become a victim of the neighborhood's increased affluence. It's turning into Montague Street! It's hard to attract affordable independent businesses to the avenue with such high rents, & many of the businesses that do come in are rather lacking in character. King of Cupcakes? Parkslope Eatery? These places were not destined to last long. Most creative young retailers would never look to set up on Seventh (too expensive & bland) so it's left to the chains, and to overpriced & uninspired boutiques & eateries. I'm a long-standing supporter of many small stores (Bagel Hole, Video Gallery, Donut Shop, etc), and a campaign to promote public support is a nice idea, but really a business that doesn't naturally cater to the needs of its populace isn't going to survive. Those Fresh Direct trucks aren't going away soon.
Fifth Avenue has even more vacancies than Seventh, along with rent hikes & a drift towards the homogenized, but right now it's still a bit got a bit more character and life about it. I'd rather be on Fifth any day, though I know it too will change.
I've nothing against the Pintchiks, but I don't understand how anyone can like that "curated" Bergen block, the antithesis of an authentic retail strip. For a more articulate response than mine, read Vanishing New York's take:
http://vanishingnewyork.blogspot.com/2010/10/bobos-on-bergen.html
Oh, and my vote for the worst store name in the city? Eponymy, right there on Pintchik row!
MSeiler
8:49 am on Tuesday, March 22, 2011
I don't just "like the idea of patronizing the mom and pops", I actually do! My end of the Slope, south of 9th St., has some great ones. Very sad to see the loss of City Casuals, although that was not a rent issue, as I understand it.
Retrofresh
10:58 am on Tuesday, March 22, 2011
At 7th Avenue & 7th Street the median house value is over $1,300,000. On neighboring streets it ranges around $1 million & up, and slightly further out it drops off to a measley $800,000 (neighborhoodscout.com). You actually need Smartmom to rally you into maintaining your business district to complete your little patch of 11215 heaven? Lame.
Lucy
3:57 pm on Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Video stores, whether they be local or chain, are technologically obsolete. They can't be saved. Netflix is almost obsolete at this point as VOD becomes ubiquitous.
Bookstores aren't obsolete yet, but they probably will be in <10 years, maybe <5 years. I read 2-3 books/week, and I haven't bought a paper book in 2 years except as gifts for the few people I know who don't use e-readers.
Both make lousy examples for this article, because both have been done in by market forces much larger than these precious, parochial concerns.
People will patronize whatever business offers them the best value and service for money. When local business offer a superior product at an acceptable price, they can and do thrive. All this talk about "local" businesses needing our support sounds suspiciously like pity, as if these businesses somehow aren't good enough to make it on their own. Bollocks.
As for the empty storefronts - I remember reading something about a recession. I think businesses do tend to fail during those.